Editorial: The 2020 Republican National Convention’s Assumptions about Trump Voters

To watch the 2020 Republican National Convention was an exercise in trying to determine whether each speaker was purposely gaslighting, or just grossly lacking in party self-awareness. One thing was clear, however: the foundation of the 2020 Republican National Convention was fear and falsehood, tailored specifically to assumptions about Trump’s base that the Republicans are banking on.

They assume the base doesn’t really understand what socialism is, that they’re terrified of it, and that they think it’s the same as communism.

The words “socialism” and “socialist” were frequently repeated throughout the convention, as nearly every speaker warned the audience that with Joe Biden, America would be cast into the darkness of socialism. “They” would take away god and guns, and use mind control to keep Americans in line.

Nikki Haley, the former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, warned that the Democrats’ “vision for America is socialism,” coupled with the desire to “tell Americans how to live and what to think.”

Don­ald Trump, Jr., cautioned the audience that “Joe Biden and the rad­i­cal Left are also now com­ing for our free­dom of speech and want to bul­ly us into sub­mis­sion.”

Kimberly Guilefoyle, partner of Donald Trump, Jr., gave the best reflection of the base’s confusion about socialism during her loud and frenzied speech: “Biden, Harris and the rest of the socialists will fundamentally change this nation. They want open borders, closed schools, dangerous amnesty, and will selfishly send your jobs back to China while they get rich. They will defund, dismantle and destroy America’s law enforcement. When you are in trouble and need police, don’t count on the Democrats.”

The GOP’s fear mongering about socialism that had been aimed at former candidate Bernie Sanders was turned on Joe Biden when Sanders dropped out of the presidential race. Biden, known for working successfully with lawmakers across the aisle, and a known moderate Democrat for at least four decades, is now cast by the GOP as “dangerous” to democracy. Republicans know that once they slap the label “socialist” on any lawmaker, much of their propaganda work is done.

They assume that people in the suburbs (all white, of course) are terrified that “others” will make their neighborhoods dangerous. (But “they’re not racist.”)

Targeting “suburban women,” the Trumpian message was based on the assumption that these women (and their families, too) are ruled by the fear that Black people, other people of color, and low-income people will move into their nice, quiet neighborhoods and create an environment of violence and crime. This is one of Trump’s favorite racist dog whistles to his base.

On the opening night of the RNC, the McCloskeys— that Saint Louis couple who were filmed standing in front of their mansion wielding firearms at Black Lives Matter demonstrators who had taken a detour through the McCloskeys’ upper-class neighborhood— had a prime speaking spot.

In an ominous tone, Patricia McCloskey warned that Democrats want to take away the suburbs. “They’re not satisfied with spreading the chaos and violence into our communities,” she said. “They want to abolish the suburbs altogether — by ending single-family home zoning. This forced rezoning would bring crime, lawlessness and low-quality apartments into now thriving suburban neighborhoods… No matter where you live, your family will not be safe in the radical Democrats’ America.”

The McCloskeys’ cautionary tale of terror in the suburbs brought to mind similar language around forced busing from earlier decades: If we bring in others, everything will not only be ruined, it will be dangerous and chaotic. (Could that be what they mean when they say “Make America Great Again”?)

Despite featuring a racist couple during the convention, RNC speakers denied that America has a problem with racism.

“It’s now fashionable to say that America is racist. That is a lie,” Nikki Haley said in her RNC speech Monday night. “America is not a racist country.”

Yet, as she spoke, America had just learned of yet another brutal shooting of an unarmed Black man by police in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Jacob Blake was shot in the back seven times in front of his children. Instead of expressing sorrow or outrage over the incident, or any of the recent similar incidents, speakers focused on the “lawlessness and chaos” of the resulting protests taking place in “Democrat-led cities across America,” blaming the “Marxist” Black Lives Matter demonstrators for the looting and violence.

They have created an alternative COVID-19 reality, and they assume that their base believes it (they do).

On each day of the RNC, nearly 1,000 people died of COVID-19 in the U.S. To date, nearly 180,000 Americans have died of the virus. No one who spoke at the RNC acknowledged the numbers, let alone that they were attached to human lives.

Yet Trump receive praise for his “heroic response” to the coronavirus pandemic. According to several speakers, Trump took fast and decisive action to contain the virus. Ventilators and supplies got to hospitals quickly, by the speakers’ accounts, and Trump shut down travel to and from China, saving “millions and millions of lives.” On the last night of the convention, Trump told the maskless, shoulder-to-shoulder crowd of 1500 on the White House lawn, that there will definitely be a vaccine “by the end of the year, or maybe even sooner,” come hell, high water, or lack of sufficient vetting.

They ignored Trump’s initial lack of response and subsequent downplaying of the pandemic. They turned the real situation of governors begging for ventilators and supplies into a success story featuring Donald Trump as a benevolent and capable leader through crisis. Grasping at one of the only positive truths they could tell about Trump’s response, they cited Trump’s partial  restrictions on travel to and from China (though shutting down travel to China was too little too late, since the virus had already arrived in New York via Europe).

In Trumpworld, the virus is a thing of the past, and it’s all due to Donald Trump’s heroic actions. White House aide Larry Kudlow portrayed Trump’s handling of the pandemic as a huge victory:

“Then came a once-in-100-year pandemic,” Kudlow said. “It was awful. Health and economic impacts were tragic, hardship and heartbreak were everywhere, but presidential leadership came swiftly and effectively with an extraordinary rescue for health and safety to successfully fight the COVID virus.” As if it were all long ago and by now, far away.

Trump Campaign Communications Director Tim Murtaugh said Trump was “out front and leading the nation in the fight against the coronavirus,” pointing to his restriction on travel into the U.S. from China and Europe and his efforts to produce PPE.

Today, the U.S. has nearly 22 percent of the world’s COVID-19 cases, though it only has 4 percent of the world’s population. Cases continue to climb in some parts of the country, though many in Trump’s base, following his example, treat the virus as if it were the common cold.

They assume, accurately, that their base are largely white evangelical fundamentalists.

Donald Trump and the RNC speech writers may or may not have studied the Bible itself very much, but they have studied the words and mentions that push the buttons of the evangelicals. Second only to the words “socialist” and “socialism” during the convention was a lexicon of evangelicalese words and phrases guaranteed to stir the hearts and evoke “amens” from many in the audience. A number of speakers peppered their speeches with “Jesus” and “Christ.”

They painted a vision of a godly America under Trump, with evangelical prayer in schools and evangelical laws against everything, well, non-evangelical. They warned that in Joe Biden’s America, people would no longer be allowed to attend church or worship (because… socialism). It should be noted that despite the fact the Joe Biden is known to have a deep religious faith, some evangelical fundamentalists don’t recognize Catholics as Christians.

Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan put the icing on all of the GOP talking points when he said that the  “Democrats won’t let you go to church, but they’ll let you protest,” referring to the strict lockdowns by many Democratic governors (and some Republicans, too) aimed at slowing the spread of the coronavirus.

Keeping in mind that evangelical fundamentalists tend to be one-issue voters (abortion), they brought in Sister Deirdre Byrne to stress that Donald Trump is “the most pro-life President that this nation has ever had.”

“President Trump will stand up against Biden-Harris, who are the most anti-life presidential ticket ever, even supporting the horrors of late term abortion and infanticide,” said Byrne.

Shame on Sister Dede for promoting a falsehood. Joe Biden has not expressed support for late-term abortion, let alone infanticide. He does support codifying Roe v. Wade into law, however. Yes, Byrne is a Catholic nun, but it’s ok to use Catholics when they can further Trump’s anti-abortion message to single-issue voters.

They assume (again, accurately) that most of Trump’s base aren’t big on fact-checking.

They know that truth is irrelevant to Trump’s base. The narrative put forth during the Republican National Convention could only work in a world where there is no fact-checking. Trump rests in the knowledge that in Trumpworld, fact-checking is a demonstration of disloyalty to the president. Donald Trump and Fox News provide all the facts they need.

It’s ironic and a little sad to see that Trump’s base, who believes that Donald Trump alone can save them from the Democrats’ tyranny and despotism (which they tend to confuse with “socialism”) is, in reality, playing right into the hands of the one who really is plunging them directly into tyranny and despotism.

The McCloskeys speak at 2020 RNC | ABC News [2020-08-24]

WATCH: Kimberly Guilfoyle’s full speech at the Republican National Convention | 2020 RNC Night 1 | PBS NewsHour [2020-08-24]

Editorial: Republicans Can’t Agree on How Best to Malign Kamala Harris

The Republicans are having a difficult time with 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s pick of Kamala Harris as his running mate. She’s formidable, and she’s a woman (two characteristics that, together, offend the sensibilities of a few in the GOP), but the issue is that they can’t agree on how best to attack Kamala Harris.

To the party of Trump (and we should note here that there are Republicans who would like to distance themselves from the party of Trump), Harris is all at once a socialist and a sellout to Wall Street. She is a moderate (which, to many Republicans, means she is without principles), at the same time that she is a radical extreme leftist. She is too tough on crime, but she’s too weak on crime. Donald Trump has been less analytical, placing Harris into the category of other intelligent and assertive women like Elizabeth Warren and Hillary Clinton, whom he calls “nasty.”

When Joe Biden first announced Kamala Harris as his running mate, some Trumpers gleefully pointed out the disapproval from the far left because she isn’t progressive enough.

“Bernie Bros get burnt!” Tweeted Brad Parscale, a Trump campaign aide.

Immediately following the announcement of Harris as Joe Biden’s pick, some right-wing pundits were warning about a hostile extreme liberal takeover of the Democratic Party.

“Kamala Harris’ extreme positions … show that the left-wing mob is controlling Biden’s candidacy, just like they would control him as president,” said Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel.

That the Republican Party would float the idea of “left-wing mob control” of Biden and Harris is in keeping with the party’s increasing slant to the far right, which fits well with its bent for supporting conspiracy theories.

For other Trumpers, the fact that financial advisory firms such as Signum Global have started telling clients that Biden’s choice of Harris reinforces the notion that the Democratic ticket is more moderate than progressive is a sign that progressives will be disenchanted with the Democratic ticket.

But wait— Other Trumpers are saying that Harris wants to turn the Democratic Party toward socialism (a concept they appear not to understand).

On the Wednesday following the announcement of Kamala Harris on Biden’s ticket, Vice President Mike Pence, in a fundraising email, wrote, “From the very first day of this Administration, President Trump has set our Nation on a path to freedom and opportunity. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris would set America on the path of SOCIALISM and DECLINE.”

Speaking of takeovers, the Republican Party seems to have been taken over by people who don’t know much about history or political science.

Quick to depict Kamala Harris as a radical lefty, they have posited that in Kamala Harris, the far left has infiltrated the Democratic Party. Not only that, but Joe Biden, they hint, is little more than a puppet controlled by the radical left.

David Bossie, Trump’s 2016 deputy campaign manager, thinks both Biden and Harris are malleable. In a recent op-ed piece, Bossie wrote, “Make no mistake about it, if elected, this weak Democratic duo will aid and abet the radical socialists and anarchists at every turn…Americans must reject Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and their dangerous ideology.”

CNN contributor Scott Jennings, a former special assistant to President George W. Bush and a former campaign adviser to Sen. Mitch McConnell, writes, “Her politics— liberal with more than a hint of authoritarianism (think of her attempts to get Donald Trump banned fro Twitter) sprinkled in for good measure— fit well on a national ticket trending hard towards both.” Jennings ignores the fact that his party supports a president who regularly defies the checks and balances of the federal government, wants to hobble the U.S. Postal Service in order to interfere with the presidential election, and fires government officials just for disagreeing with him.

Fox News pundit Tucker Carlson, on the other hand, knows that hate and love are just two sides of the same emotion, so instead, he chose an attempt at indifference by simply trying to diminish Harris. In a monologue on his Fox News show last week, he not only dismissed the correct pronunciation of Kamala Harris’ name, he said this: “So, it seemed inconceivable that given his current state, Joe Biden would choose someone so transparently one-dimensional as Kamala Harris, someone as empty as he is. It would be the first entirely hollow presidential ticket in American history and we thought it could never happen. But it is. They’re doing it anyway.”

Still other members of the Party of Trump have taken to insulting Harris by making a show of being insulted by her. On Fox News host Jeanine Pirro’s show, Lara Trump, Donald Trump’s daughter-in-law, who is married to Eric Trump, and who spearheaded the Women for Trump tour, said, “I for one was insulted when months ago Joe Biden came out and he said, ‘Guess what? It’s going to be a woman who’s my running mate.’ Let’s not worry about qualifications, let’s not worry about what they bring to the table. If these people want to stand up for equality, people in this country will never be fully equal in their eyes until they stop pandering for votes and playing identity politics.

“It didn’t even matter who it was going to be,” Lara Trump concluded. “Women were already insulted.”

As if to demonstrate that she wasn’t too passionate about Kamala Harris, she did what appears to have become a standard move by the right to show disregard for Harris: she mispronounced Kamala Harris’ name.

Kamala Harris is neither a radical left-wing extremist, nor a socialist, nor a noncommittal people-pleaser. Nor is she a token. Kamala Harris and Joe Biden’s “dangerous ideology” talks of a future, and their ideal for the American experience in that future, where groups of people are not marginalized; where Americans can earn a living wage, and where they can have access to affordable health care. The party of Trump, on the other hand, hopes for a future that is dangerous to everyone but straight white folks; one that looks like its version of an idealized past, where white heterosexual people are in power and everyone else “keeps their place;” and where no one gets help or health care or food that they may not “deserve.”

Americans are free to disagree with Kamala Harris’ platform, but she is clear on what she stands for. The party of Trump has a platform that is not based on what it stands for, but what it is against.

Republicans Struggle To React To Kamala Harris As VP Pick | TODAY
[2020-08-13]

Republicans Can’t Agree On How To Attack Kamala As Biden/Harris Make 1st Appearance | Roland S. Martin. [2020-08-13]