Editorial: If Trump Can’t Stop Mail-in Voting, His New Postmaster Could Slow It Down

For months, Donald Trump has promoted his conspiracy theory that voting by mail leads to “widespread voter fraud.” Analyses of past elections indicate that he is wrong. Nevertheless, Trump maintains that if a large number of Americans vote by mail in the 2020 presidential election, the election will be illegitimized. As he pushes his narrative, Trump, himself, is attempting to cheat possibly millions of voters out of their right and access to vote during a pandemic that would otherwise force voters to choose between risking infection at the polls and staying home. The White House’s efforts to obstruct mail-in voting, however, may go beyond simply preaching and tweeting against it.

The U.S. Postal Service has a new Postmaster General, Trump loyalist Louis DeJoy. DeJoy has no experience as a letter carrier or postal service employee, unlike Postmasters General who preceded him, but he is a top Trump donor. If that’s not worrisome, we have only to consider the other heavy donors Trump has appointed to top government positions for which they had no background experience, including Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, and Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Dr. Ben Carson.

In addition, DeJoy and his wife, Aldona Wos, have some stakes in several Postal Service competitors, including United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS). In some other sectors, this might be called conflict of interests. But this is the Trump administration.

We can hardly be surprised that Postmaster General DeJoy wants to dramatically reform the U.S. Postal Service, ostensibly in the name of efficiency. One of his first changes will be to eliminate overtime for hundreds of thousands of U.S. postal workers, even though he knows that it will cause delays in mail delivery. DeJoy also plans to cut services and reduce hours of operation at some post offices, as well as close a number of others.

The U.S. Postal Service’s finances have been strained for years, and the coronavirus pandemic has placed an additional burden on it. The coronavirus relief package that Congress passed in March, however, authorized the U.S. Postal Service to borrow up to $10 billion from the U.S. Treasury to maintain essential services during the pandemic. Though the agency operates independently of the federal government, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin led efforts by the White House to persuade the Postal Service to agree to greater presidential control in exchange for the federal bailout funding. Incidentally, the president has expressed his contempt for the U.S. Post Office, referring to it as a “joke.”

The coronavirus pandemic has led to a surge in mail-in voting in this year’s elections. During the spring primary elections, absentee ballots were up exponentially from previous years. With no foreseeable end to the spread of the virus by November, even more voters are expected to cast their ballots by mail, and many states want to facilitate this.

Most states already allow some type of mail-in voting. Republicans fear that it favors Democrats, but according to data, it has not historically provided either party with an advantage. At the same time, increased voter turnout tends to benefit Democrats, and voting by mail will make it easer to vote, thus increasing voter turnout. Trump has clearly been made aware of this.

The president knows he lags significantly behind his opponent, Joe Biden, in most presidential polls. His attempts now to portray mail-in voting as  fraught with cheating and fraud are setting the stage for Trump’s intention to discredit the election should he lose.

This week, Trump realized that his efforts to interfere with mail-in voting might work too well, where some of his supporters are concerned. Fearing a situation in November where the coronavirus would keep them home on Election Day, Trump amended his crusade against mail-in voting. He urged GOP voters in Florida and Arizona, only, to cast their ballots by mail, saying, in effect, “It doesn’t work well in most places, except in Florida and Arizona.” Both states have Republican governors.

In contrast, the Trump administration is suing Democrat-run Nevada over its plan to allow universal mail-in voting, saying Nevada is “unprepared.”

“Even if Nevada wanted to do it well, they wouldn’t have enough time. I’m sure the post office doesn’t have enough time. Millions of ballots all of a sudden coming out of nowhere? You know, voting starts in a very short period of time.”

If voters and their governors can’t be discouraged from mailing in their votes during the 2020 election, some lawmakers fear that the U.S. Postal Service, itself, could interfere with election integrity. Postal workers will continue doing their best to get mail to its destination as quickly as possible. The new boss that Trump has appointed for them, however, could slow things down considerably.

Without specifically naming Donald Trump or Louis DeJoy, former President Barack Obama, during his eulogy for the late congressman John Lewis, warned of the current attack on voting rights that is being conducted “with surgical precision, even undermining the Postal Service in the run-up to an election that is going to be dependent on mailed-in ballots so people don’t get sick.”

With DeJoy’s postal reforms just in time for the November election, imagine a surge of ballots lying on the floors of post offices across the country and missing their deadlines or timelines because postal workers are no longer allowed to work overtime to process them in a timely manner. Imagine low-income rural voters, such as those in West Virginia, where DeJoy plans to close a number of post offices, unable to get to a nearby post office to ensure a timely postmark on their ballots. Imagine bundles of ballots from certain areas of the country being altogether mysteriously “misplaced.”

Since many states don’t currently accept mail-in ballots unless they arrive by Election Day (even if postmarked before Election Day), on-time delivery will be crucial to this election. If ballots miss deadlines despite voters’ doing all they can to ensure timely arrival, voters will have been disenfranchised. As head of the U.S. Postal Service, Louis DeJoy has the authority and duty to ensure that voters who cast their votes with mail-in ballots are not deprived of their right to vote. But, as stated earlier, this is the Trump administration.

Let’s Talk Trump’s Appointment of Postmaster General DeJoy and the Elements of Criminal Conspiracy | Glenn Kirschner  [2020-08-04]

How Trump Is Slowing Down The Post Office In The Year Of The Mail-In Ballot | All In | MSNBC  [2020-07-29]

Editorial: Injecting Disinfectant: Trump’s Comments Need a Warning Label

Donald Trump didn’t “recommend” injecting disinfectant, per se, but he didn’t need to go as far as recommending it. All he had to do was wonder out loud about its possible effectiveness against COVID-19 for some of his supporters to jump on board, and the rest to make excuses for him. Are disinfectants destined to be the new hydroxychloroquine in the eyes of Trump’s base? the rest of us wondered.

Trump had just heard a presentation by undersecretary for science and technology William Bryan, of the Department of Homeland Security. Bryan was discussing a study that found that exposure to the sun and the use of disinfectants such as bleach can weaken or kill the virus. Bryan was referring to the use of disinfectants as cleaning agents on surfaces and as aerosol sprays, not as treatments to be ingested or injected into the body.

During his April 23 coronavirus press briefing, Trump mentioned the possibility of “bringing light inside the body” as a possible way to eliminate the virus from patients. He then embarked on a riff about perhaps injecting disinfectant to treat COVID-19.

“And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me.”

Understandably, many Americans were aghast. Certainly, we’ve developed a degree of numbness to Trump’s absurd statements, to his often ignorant pronouncements, and his presumption to know more than the experts on…well, just about any topic. But Trump’s conjecture about the possibility of using cleaning agents internally to fight COVID-19 likely shocked even many six-year-olds who were taught by their parents that you mustn’t ever, ever, ever drink such things.

With each of Donald Trump’s increasingly preposterous and unhinged statements or actions, many Americans have said, time after time, “This one is it. Surely, this time is the last straw. No one can possibly believe/support/excuse this.” This was another one of those times.

And yet, as the story spread through the news outlets, Donald Trump’s supporters rushed to clarify, defend, or deny Trump’s words.

Those of Trump’s base who didn’t interpret Trump’s words as a recommendation rallied around him to defend what he said as “not what he said.”

Many of Trump’s defenders immediately took to social media, spending the weekend posting articles and comments “pointing out” that those who vaccinate “already inject disinfectants,” and touting all manner of related unproven and fringe treatments. As if this somehow meant that it might actually be ok to try injecting a home cleaning agent. As if this somehow made it ok for Trump to plant the idea into the malleable heads of some of his followers.

Trump apologists such as Breitbart and Fox, followed by all who only get their news from those sources, attempted to “clarify” Trump’s remarks, yet did nothing to effectively explain what he might have meant.

Joel B. Pollak of Breitbart wrote, “Trump used the word ‘inject,’ but what he meant was using a process — which he left ‘medical doctors’ to define — in which patients’ lungs might be cleared of the virus, given new knowledge about its response to light and other factors.”

Fox News’ Laura Ingraham blamed the media for misrepresenting what Trump had said. Notably, Ingraham did not replay what Trump actually said so that her audience could hear for themselves. Instead, she played clips of the shocked responses by CNN and MSNBC journalists.

“So was he telling Americans to drink Clorox? Really?” Ingraham sneered.

“Absolutely not,” responded Fox contributor Sara Carter. “These are journalists that don’t let the facts stand in the way of their lies. They hate Donald Trump, the president, so much that they will twist his words whenever they can at the expense of the American people.”

What of the Trump devotees who did listen to Trump, and who interpreted his words as a possible recommendation? And what of the manufacturers of Lysol and other disinfectants who were so alarmed by Trump’s comments that they immediately issued warnings against taking their products internally?

As for Donald Trump, himself, he claimed a day later that clearly he was being sarcastic.

“I was asking a question sarcastically to reporters like you, just to see what would happen,” he said to reporters on Friday.

Breitbart’s Pollak, who had earlier attempted to “clarify” what Trump meant, subsequently changed his position, siding with Trump that Trump was just being sarcastic.

The idea that everyone should have understood Trump’s speculation to be mere sarcasm, if it was, ignores the fact that New York City poison control centers reported an increase in calls in the 18 hours following Trump’s speculation about injecting disinfectants to treat coronavirus.

The most shocking and irresponsible defense of Trump came from infectious disease specialist Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House pandemic response coordinator. When asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper for her opinion about Trump’s remarks, she didn’t give a medical opinion, but instead defended Trump’s words as a harmless “dialogue” with health professionals, saying he was just “wondering out loud” about the possibility of using disinfectants internally.

Americans knew that they could count on Trump’s base and his loyal news outlets to defend, explain, and justify his every word and action. But when one of the medical experts we count on to keep us safe declines to acknowledge the recklessness of Trump’s words, and instead, as Birx did, blames the furor on the media for replaying them, it seems as if we’re running out of options for whom we can look to for our well-being.

If it’s true that Trump was just misunderstood, it’s also true that no leader should ever have casual “dialogue” with medical professionals in front of the public about the possibility of using harmful chemicals internally as a treatment. If the truth is that Trump was just being sarcastic, that, too, was reckless in light of the fact that some might take Trump’s “musing” as a recommendation (and some apparently did). Every possible spin by Trump and his supporters on Trump’s feckless speculation is simply a defense of the indefensible.

“When the person with the most powerful position on the planet is encouraging people to think about disinfectants, whether it was serious or not, people listen,” said Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer.

Americans poison themselves after Trump’s ‘disinfectant injection’ suggestion | City News Toronto [2020-04-26]

Trump: Disinfectant comments were ‘sarcastic’ | Associated Press
[2020-04-24]