Editorial: Putin Offered Bounties on American Troops; Trump Did Nothing

This weekend, the world learned that a Russian intelligence unit was offering Taliban militants bounties on coalition troops, including Americans, in Afghanistan. We also learned that the Trump administration knew about it as early as January of 2019. The White House is scrambling to create its narrative around why no one in the Trump administration considered this intel to be grave enough to warrant further action by America’s Commander-in-Chief.

After the story broke in the New York Times, Trump did not address the information immediately, but instead went golfing.

On Sunday, he took to Twitter in an effort to slither out from under any personal responsibility, claiming he hadn’t previously been briefed on the information.

“Nobody briefed or told me, @VP Pence, or Chief of Staff @MarkMeadows about the so-called attacks on our troops in Afghanistan by Russians, as reported through an ‘anonymous source’ by the Fake News @nytimes,” Trump tweeted on Sunday morning.

On Sunday evening, Trump tweeted, “Intel just reported to me that they did not find this info credible, and therefore did not report it to me or @VP. Possibly another fabricated Russia Hoax, maybe by the Fake News @nytimesbooks, wanting to make Republicans look bad!!!”

Trump didn’t ask why no one had briefed him. He didn’t express outrage that rewards had been offered for special attacks on American soldiers; he didn’t denounce Russian president Putin; he didn’t try to verify the information or proclaim that he wanted to get to the bottom of this piece of news that would be upsetting to the loved ones of soldiers stationed in Afghanistan; he didn’t show any concern for the safety of American troops.

As with his response to the coronavirus pandemic, Donald Trump is not concerned about the lives of Americans that have been lost or that may be currently in danger; he’s concerned with how the news makes him look. This, to him, is nothing more than another plot to make him look bad. And Trump looks very bad.

Most parents wouldn’t let their teenager use “I didn’t know about it, so don’t blame me,” as a valid excuse to avoid consequences; it’s never an acceptable device for a president of the United States. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) in a floor speech on the topic on Monday said that in this case, “ignorance isn’t exculpatory.”

“’No one told me’ is not an excuse for a commender in chief. It is in fact a confession of incompetence.”

On Monday, in response to questions about why, if it was true that the president hadn’t known about the bounty plot against American soldiers, no one had briefed him, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany responded that the intelligence hadn’t been verified, and so was not included in a presidential briefing.

“There is no consensus within the intelligence community on these allegations,” McEnany said, adding there were “dissenting opinions” on the intelligence assessment.

Typically, a president of the United States is immediately notified of any possible threat to US troops. If what Kayleigh McEnany said were true, it would mean that White House officials were mulling over this urgent piece of intelligence for months. They took no action.

Perhaps White House officials didn’t trust the president with the information. Some reports say that senior White House officials saw Trump as a danger to national security. Perhaps they feared that Trump would tell Putin, Putin would deny it, and Trump would double down on his pandering to Putin. Or perhaps they were afraid to brief Trump because of their experience with his unhinged responses to other situations that might cast him in an unfavorable light.

According to political columnist David Ignatius, who did further research that confirmed the claims in the New York Times’ story, “(The Pentagon was) pounding on the door of the White House NSC operation, urging that the White House address the intelligence surrounding Putin’s bounty plot. But, says Ignatius, “One of the things I’ve watched with this administration is a growing fear of telling the boss the truth. Because the boss will go nuts, and he’ll be angry at you, or he’ll fire you…We saw this again and again in his interventions in military issues. …The president goes ballistic if he gets news he doesn’t want to hear.”

On Monday, it was confirmed that the intel about the plot had been included in the president’s daily briefing, at least once. He may just not have bothered to read it. While Donald Trump was praising Putin and encouraging him to rejoin the G7, Putin was offering money to the Taliban to kill American soldiers.

This year alone, our president has ducked leadership as the coronavirus has become a pandemic. He can’t be bothered to sort out opportunistic “thugs” from peaceful demonstrators (or acknowledge the systemic racism they’re protesting). It’s simply too much to ask, then, that we should expect Trump to show up in any way for American soldiers or for our national security, though he does manage to show up for the world’s despots.

If Donald Trump just didn’t read the briefing about Putin’s bounty plot and was consequently unaware, he is incompetent. If senior officials avoided orally briefing him out of fear of his response, it demonstrates Trump’s instability, indicates the depth of dysfunction of this administration, and makes a frightening statement about the tenuous state of our nation’s security. If he knew, and did nothing, it means he made the conscious choice to allow the lives of U.S. service members to be at risk. None of these options indicates a president who is in any way fit for office.

Trump denies knowledge of Russia bounty plot  |  Reuters [2020-06-29]

Outrage grows over Russian bounties  |  ABC News [2020-06-28]

Rob Porter’s Resignation: Many Troubling Elements

Rob Porter, a White House senior aide, resigned last week after allegations surfaced that he had physically and verbally abused two former wives and a former girlfriend. Porter has repeatedly denied the claims. What’s troubling is that some in the White House, including Chief of Staff John Kelly, knew about at least some of the allegations since November of 2017, when the FBI flagged Rob Porter during its background check on Porter for a security clearance.

The White House claims that John Kelly was only “fully aware” of the allegations as of Tuesday. But even if Kelly was “partially aware,” or “a little aware,” why didn’t he follow up on them? Instead, he continued to praise Rob Porter, not only allowing him to continue his duties, but expanding them.

“Rob Porter is a true man of integrity and honor, and I can’t say enough good things about him. He is a friend, a confidante and a trusted professional. I am proud to serve alongside him,” said Kelly on Tuesday.

After photos showing Porter’s first wife, Colbie Holderness, with a black eye, surfaced, Kelly stated he was “shocked.”

So many troubling elements surround this situation.

Both of Rob Porter’s former wives – Holderness, as well as Jennifer Willoughby – spoke out about the abuse and notified the FBI, citing police actions, including a protection order filed by Willoughby against Porter in 2010.  Holderness provided photos in early 2017, showing evidence of Porter’s alleged physical abuse of her.

Though the FBI did inform the White House about the allegations, no one at the White House found them troubling enough to question the appropriateness of Porter’s top-security White House role. In hindsight, the White House has conceded that it “could have handled the situation better.”

A National Security Issue

Rob Porter was a White House aide who had close contact with the President. Because of the domestic violence claims the FBI had flagged in November, Porter has never had a full security clearance. Yet, Porter’s interim security clearance allowed him access to sensitive documents, and freedom to travel on Air Force One with the President. Someone with Porter’s history, and in Porter’s position, is ripe for blackmail. This would place the President, and in turn, the country, in a vulnerable position.

Kelly did confirm he’d known for months about the allegations against Porter. “In November,” he said, “I got an update on some of the investigations. And the update was that there was some things that needed to be looked into. And that’s it.”

All clearance matters, however, do cross the desk of the White House Chief of Staff. Kelly, as Chief of Staff, would have received a detailed FBI report in November – long before last week. So why, following the report, was Porter allowed to work closely with Trump? Did Kelly even look at the report? If he didn’t, someone in the Chief of Staff office did; why didn’t that person act on the information?

No Statement from the White House

A week into the Porter issue, the White House has made statements in support of Rob Porter, but not in support of Porter’s ex-wives. Trump said he was “saddened” – not for Porter’s ex-wives, but for Rob Porter and the potential ruin of his career, even in the face of the FBI report, and the photos that provided evidence.

On Friday, Trump stated, “We wish him well. …It’s an…obviously tough time for him…He said very strongly he was innocent.”

On Saturday, Trump tweeted, “People’s lives are being shattered and destroyed by mere allegation. Some are true and some are false. Some are old and some are new. There is no recovery for someone falsely accused – life and career are gone. Is there no such thing any longer as Due Process?”

Tough Position for Trump

According to Sarah Sanders, “The White House takes domestic violence very seriously.”

If so, perhaps Donald Trump should tweet as much. Instead, Trump’s Twitter silence in that regard seems to indicate that abuse against a woman is not grounds for disqualification from a job, even if it’s a sensitive, high-security role. Allegations of such abuse don’t warrant further investigation in this White House.

What a tough position Donald Trump must find himself in. During the presidential election, at least 15 women accused Trump of sexual assault, harassment, and lewd behavior. Like Porter, Trump continues to deny the accusations. If Trump were to stop holding up Rob Porter as a victim, and admit any credibility to the claims against him, it would be harder for Trump to continue to deny the allegations against himself.

New focus on when White House staff knew about Rob Porter | Fox News [2018-02-08]

The White House Defends President Donald Trump’s Handling Of Rob Porter Accusations | TIME [2018-02-12]