Mueller Investigation a Real Witch Hunt?

Donald Trump has used the phrase “witch hunt” so often in recent months that the term has lost its potency. Trump casually tosses the term around via Twitter with frequency. His references to Robert Mueller’s investigation of the Trump campaign’s connections with Russia as a witch hunt appear to have accomplished Trump’s apparent goal of diminishing the legitimacy of the investigation – at least to his supporters.

Of Trump’s supporters, 51 percent disapprove of the Mueller investigation, and just 43 percent support it. Overall, 69 percent of Americans support the Mueller investigation.

The modern definition of a witch hunt is “an attempt to find and punish a particular group of people who are being blamed for something, often simply because of their opinions and not because they have actually done anything wrong,” according to the Collins Dictionary.

The origins of the term, of course, harken back to the days of the Salem witch trials. Today, people are fond of applying the term “witch hunt” hyperbolically when they feel – or want to appear – wrongly targeted or scrutinized, even if the application of the term is ridiculous and has no real parallel.

In the 1692 Salem Village witch hunt, those who were accused of witchcraft were held without a fair investigation. Nineteen accused people were hanged, and one was crushed to death. Their “guilt” was based on hearsay and mass hysteria, and little or no real evidence. Robert Mueller’s “witch hunt,” on the other hand, has been a year-long, careful endeavor, aimed at finding facts and amassing solid evidence.

“…Trump comparing the investigation into his campaign to a crisis that left 20 people dead in the 17th century is clearly ridiculous — there is much more evidence in the criminal indictments, the court-sanctioned wiretaps, and the consensus of Republican and Democratic investigators for Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election than there is for witchcraft — and rather unsavory,” write Dylan Scott and Tara Isabella Burton, of Vox.

In 17th-century Salem Village, the (mostly) women who were charged did not have the option to loudly undercut their accusers. They had no support; those who might have supported them lived in fear of being accused themselves. Regarding Robert Mueller’s “witch hunt,” on the other hand, Trump feels free to speak and tweet his opinion.

“You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history – led by some very bad and conflicted people!” Trump tweeted on June 15, 2017.

“It would seem very hard to obstruct justice for a crime that never happened! Witch Hunt!” tweeted Trump on May 1, 2018.

“This is the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in American history!” he tweeted on May 18, 2018.

“We’ve turned the expression on its head. Traditionally a witchcraft charge amounted to powerful men charging powerless women with a phony crime. Now it is powerful men screeching that they are being charged with phony crimes,” says Stacey Schiff, author of The Witches, a book about the Salem witch trials.

Hyperbole, though, is Donald Trump’s style. Misappropriation of terms is a Trump hallmark, as is good old-fashioned gaslighting. But to Trump’s supporters, the more often he tosses out the phrase “witch hunt” in a tweet, the more they see the idea as truth.

Donald Trump’s ‘Witch Hunt’ | HuffPost [2018-04-11]

Trump slams Mueller probe calling it a ‘witch hunt’ | Fox Business [2018-03-19]

Donald Trump’s Growing Parallels with Joseph McCarthy

Long before Donald Trump was elected President, many were comparing his behavior to that of Joseph McCarthy, the 1950s U.S. Senator from Wisconsin best known for his Communist witch hunt. Joseph McCarthy attempted to expose alleged communists and others he suspected of subversion in the U.S. government.

It seems that the resemblance to Joseph McCarthy continues to grow as Trump stacks up more and more actions and statements that approximate those of McCarthy. Perhaps this should scare us even more than McCarthy scared us, because McCarthy was a Senator; Trump is our President.

McCarthyism is defined as “The practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.” The term tends to have a broader meaning in recent years – often used to describe demagogic attacks or unsubstantiated, reckless accusations against one’s adversaries, calling into question their patriotism or character. “Smearing American political institutions for political gain” (Carl Bernstein).

Joseph McCarthy was elected by appealing to the fears and prejudices of his base, many of whom felt alienated and unheard. Donald Trump was elected in a similar manner – by a base who believed he would be a voice for them. Trump maintains the support of his base in the same way – by exploiting their fears and resentments, and by demonizing those whom he has convinced them are their enemies.

McCarthy used tactics such as discrediting those who criticized him, and questioning the patriotism of those who didn’t support him. Like McCarthy, Donald Trump often belittles those who speak out against his behavior. In a recent tweet, for example, he referred to Senator Dick Durbin as “Little Dicky Durbin” when Durbin called Trump out for his remarks about “s***hole countries. More recently, Trump, though some say he was joking, lightly applied the idea of treason to the Democrats who weren’t applauding during Trump’s State of the Union Address.

Donald Trump continually smears immigrants, creating an unfounded connection between immigrants and crime, and fueling suspicion toward immigrants by his base. He stirs up resentment toward non-whites, as well as the LGBT community.

Trump ridicules Democrats, and Republicans when they disagree with him. The press, too, is a constant target, and Trump goes to great lengths to discredit them. Toward all of his perceived enemies, he hurls insults, profanity, and sarcasm. At the same time, like McCarthy, Trump seems to enjoy the publicity he receives when he’s repudiated by a critic.

We could write off Trump’s behavior as “eccentric,” or “speaking his mind” (or speaking his base’s mind) and leave it at that. In a couple of years, perhaps someone else will be elected, and a different group will complain. But Donald Trump’s words and actions cause more than just distaste among his opponents.

When Trump, the leader of our nation, promotes animosity and mistrust toward his critics, and when he ridicules those who cross him, he sows divisiveness among all Americans. When he seeks to undermine key government agencies and posts by casting even subtle doubt as to their integrity, he breeds chaos and further dissolves unity among us.

Donald Trump’s base, so far,  defend and make excuses for him, no matter what. In Joseph McCarthy’s case, his constituents’ support for him eventually faded. McCarthy was disciplined. Will Donald Trump’s actions ever reach the point where even his current staunch supporters have had enough? As with Joseph McCarthy’s supporters, will Trump’s base ever reach the point where they no longer see the emperor’s clothes?

Understanding McCarthyism |  Discovery Education [2015-09-15]

Donald Trump is the New Joseph McCarthy |  HuffPost [2016-06-09]

Carl Bernstein Compares Trump to Joe McCarthy: ‘Authoritarian Demagogue’ | CNN [2018-02-07]