Editorial: Trump’s Coronavirus Smoke Screen: “No Finger-Pointing”

As the coronavirus continues to ravage the U.S., Donald Trump and his sycophants admonish, “no finger-pointing.” Pleas from governors for resources, questions from journalists about statistics, dissent from health experts about treatments and precautions against the virus—Trump and his supporters avoid meaningful responses to any of those, and instead label them as “partisan finger-pointing.”
Family therapists know this ploy well. It’s the old scenario where the bad actor tries to deflect from his bad behavior by reframing the other’s response to it as the actual bad behavior.
Donald Trump has not only shown his inability and unwillingness to take responsibility for his mistakes and failures, but also—despite wanting to be seen as leader—for trying to prevent them. He has demonstrated his uncanny knack for gaslighting his way out of any culpability for a crisis so that his base perceive it as the fault of the opponent. Anyone who calls attention to one of Trump’s disasters by simply asking a question or presenting a fact, is pejoratively labeled a “finger pointer.” To his base, this excuses Trump from justifying or explaining himself.
“No finger-pointing” is often little more than an attempt to deflect blame or responsibility by implying that the “finger pointer” is petty, is against finding a solution, and is part of the problem.
The coronavirus itself is not Donald Trump’s fault, but we can certainly do a good deal of justified finger-pointing straight at Donald J. Trump for how it has played out here in the U.S. It is he who has shown himself to be against finding a real solution; it is he who has exacerbated the problem.
We can point the finger at Donald Trump for his downplaying of the virus, and his message to his base that it was a hoax. For 10 weeks, Trump disregarded the seriousness of the situation, calling it a flu that would “miraculously” disappear on its own with the warmer weather.
Consequently, even amid the ubiquitous reports of COVID-19 deaths, the footage of overcrowded hospital emergency rooms, and the daily statistics of new cases, some Trump supporters still refuse to believe that the coronavirus and the decimation it has caused are little more than “fake news.” Insisting on “living their lives” and refusing to take social distancing measures, they have without question been responsible for at least some of the spread. As of April 23, there were 826,936 confirmed cases in the U.S. Just two months ago, on February 22, there were 15 cases.
Had Donald Trump insisted from the beginning that his base take the crisis seriously and observe precautions, there is no doubt they would have unquestioningly obeyed. One can only wonder at the great impact the words of their leader could have had on slowing the overall spread. The finger points directly at Donald Trump.

Trump’s culpability in this crisis began long before we had heard of COVID-19. In 2018, he disbanded The Global Health Security and Biodefense unit (the pandemic response team formed by president Barack Obama) that was responsible for pandemic preparedness. Though some members of the team were reassigned, this dismantling of the team left the U.S. unprepared for a pandemic. Trump also “streamlined” our ability to respond to a health crisis by allowing maintenance contracts to lapse on crucial equipment such as ventilators, and by failing to maintain and store sufficient supplies such as personal protective equipment (PPE).

While he failed to act for that 10 weeks, did that cross his conscience? Was he hoping no one would notice? A leader with integrity might acknowledge that this was a huge mistake, quickly act to correct it, and go forward as best he or she could. At worst, a different leader might try to justify it, yet still do what he/she should to pick up the remaining pieces and act.

But Trump has shown us a new “worst.” Instead of responding to the quickly spreading virus, he pretended that none of it was happening until it was too late. He continues to discredit the warnings and advice of public health experts, and dismisses scientific data. The finger can point nowhere but to Donald Trump.

When it became clear that he could no longer avoid the crisis caused by the spread of the disease, he did little else but cast blame. Despite his administration’s own admonition against finger-pointing, he blamed his predecessor, Obama, for the federal government’s lack of pandemic preparedness, though, even if true, Trump has had three years to correct it. He blamed the states’ governors for needing too much from him. He blamed China because “they started it.” He blamed the Democrats, because, you know…Democrats.

“I don’t take responsibility at all,” said President Donald Trump on March 13, regarding the exponential spread of the coronavirus in the U.S.

And yet, when this is all over, if it is ever really over, Donald Trump will take responsibility for any scrap of perceived success or victory. In fact, he’ll hyperbolize it. We can expect him to again cite his “closing off the U.S. to China” as the one thing that prevented more deaths in the U.S. (He has already said it could have been “billions” of deaths out of our population of 330 million). He continually cites that one move because that is the only move he can claim.

In the absence of Donald Trump’s leadership, governors and other leaders have assumed responsibility for the well-being of their constituents, and have voiced their willingness to shoulder blame should their decisions have backlash. It’s notable, too, that these leaders have been quick to praise and give credit to many others’ responses to the pandemic.

Placing blame will not move us successfully through the COVID-19 pandemic. It does, however, make clear the trajectory our country took toward its current position as global leader in the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases while lagging behind other countries in our pandemic response. The Trump administration’s “no finger-pointing” is a desperate attempt at making us forget that.

Fact-check: A timeline of how President Trump responded to the coronavirus | WGN [2020-04-05]

Donald Trump: criticism of coronavirus response is ‘political’ |
The Telegraph [2020-04-21]

El Paso Mass Shooting: Motivated by Anti-Hispanic Sentiment?

On Saturday, August 3, a mass shooting occurred at an El Paso, Texas, mall, about five miles from the main border checkpoint with Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. A gunman shot and killed 22 people and injured dozens of others. Nine of the at least 22 who were hospitalized were in critical condition as of Monday morning. One of them is only four years old.

The suspect, 21-year-old Patrick Crusius, is in police custody. Investigators are pursuing criminal and civil rights hate crime investigations and seeking “domestic terrorism” charges against Crusius. 

According to authorities, Crusius allegedly posted a document titled The Inconvenient Truth to several websites shortly before the shooting. The document is an anti-immigrant screed that denounces the growing Hispanic population in Texas, and cites that as the reason for the mass shooting. The document also expresses support for the shooter who opened fire at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand on March 15, killing 51 people. 

“In general,” wrote Crusius, “I support the Christchurch shooter and his manifesto. This attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas. They are the instigators, not me. I am simply defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an invasion.” 

Some American Hispanic leaders are saying that Donald Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric is at least partly to blame for the violence against immigrants, and for this incident. 

Rep. Joaquin Castro, who represents San Antonio, and is chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, said, “The President has put a target on the back of the Hispanic community for years now, and there’s a cost to that kind of dangerous and racially divisive rhetoric. …If you look at the shooter‘s manifesto, it’s consistent with the language that President Trump has used to describe Hispanic immigrants as being part of an invasion of the United States.”

It is almost as horrifying to hear a few of the various responses from Trump supporters who seem like ordinary, “harmless” citizens. While not exactly supporting the mass shooting themselves, some seem to make an excuse for it.

“People are angry,” said one. “They’re tired of people coming over our border and bringing crime and disease.” As if the border situation were worse than a mass shooting. As if it justified a mass shooting. As if it were even true.

El Paso shooting: Several killed as gunman opens fire in Texas Walmart
The Telegraph | [2019-08-04]

Death toll from El Paso mass shooting rises to 22
Fox News | [2019-08-05]