Scott Pruitt’s Proposed Obama-era Rollbacks: Is Time on Our Side?

Under Scott Pruitt, the current head of the Environmental Protection Agency, a large number of Obama-era EPA regulations are under attack. Donald Trump promised to destroy Obama’s environmental protection legacy, simply because it was Obama’s legacy. Scott Pruitt intends to help Trump carry out his promise.

Currently, Scott Pruitt’s EPA has targeted more than 60 environmental regulations from the Obama era for demolition, delay, or suspension. As it does in other areas, such as education, health care, and gun safety policy, the Trump administration demonstrates that it values reversing anything done by the previous administration, as well as saying “no” to anything from “the left,” over the safety and health of its constituents.

Fortunately for Americans, undoing federal regulations is more complicated than simply ordering Scott Pruitt to make it so. The courts don’t look favorably on rolling back regulations simply because one doesn’t like the person who passed them. At least some of Scott Pruitt’s rollbacks have been challenged by the legal system; six have been reversed in court.

In his rush to overturn regulations, Scott Pruitt has often failed to follow many legal protocols, and has neglected to provide adequate supporting materials such as legal and scientific data to justify his proposals. This has resulted in sloppy and poorly crafted legal cases, which aren’t likely to hold up in court. An example is the attempted repeal of the Obama-era emissions law that aimed to reduce auto tailpipe emissions of greenhouse gases.

“If (it) gets challenged in court, I just don’t see how they provide anything that gives a technical justification to undo the rule,” said James McCargar, a former EPA senior policy analyst.

Although we should be vigilant, it is wise to remember that the laws passed during the Obama administration sometimes required years of careful scientific research and legal due diligence in order to withstand thorough examination in the courts. Similarly, they would take time to dismantle.

“You have to do the hard work of developing a rule that can withstand judicial scrutiny, even though it isn’t sexy,” says David Hayes, director of the State Energy & Environmental Impact Center at NYU School of Law.  “Pruitt hasn’t been willing to do that, and that’s why he isn’t really having much of an impact.”

No matter how much Scott Pruitt wishes he could take down Obama’s environmental legacy with the swipe of a pen or the tap of a gavel, it also takes time and due diligence to undo laws. Or, in Scott Pruitt’s case, many of his proposed repeals won’t even make it to the “pending” phase before the courts strike them down. Perhaps we can dare to hope that the haphazardness of Scott Pruitt’s attempts will continue to keep our current environmental regulations in place, at least until a new administration.

EPA to Roll Back Obama-era Emissions, Fuel Economy Standards | CBS This Morning [2018-04-03]

Trump’s EPA to Roll Back Obama-era Fuel Economy Standards  | Fox News [2018-04-03]

* Trump’s EPA rolls back clean air regulations, Trump’s FCC rolls back Internet privacy regulations, UK triggers EU Brexit (2017-03-31)

Liberal & Uncategorized


1. Trump Vows to End the Nonexistent War on Coal: The Daily Show (2017-03-29)


The Daily Show with Trevor Noah – “Despite a rise in alternative energies, President Trump signs an executive order to roll back regulations on the coal industry.”

1. Pelosi Suggests Trump’s Coal Exec. Order is ‘Really Sinful,’ ‘Degrading of God’s Creation’ (2017-03-30)


Washington Free Beacon – “News & Politics.”

2. The Scrapping Of Internet Privacy: Something We Can All Hate Together (2017-03-30)


The Late Show with Stephen Colbert – “Stephen doesn’t recall any Americans marching in support of abolishing internet privacy. But if they did… victory!”

2. Technology expert discusses rollbacks on Internet privacy (2017-03-31)


FOX 2 St. Louis – “ST. LOUIS, MO (KTVI) – This week, Congress voted to rollback Internet privacy protections. This decision allows the internet service providers (ISP) to gather data and sell information on your Internet usage, without fear of being sued. This information includes app usage, e-mail and messaging content, mobile location data and web browsing history. While the idea of using privacy blocks such as private mode creates the thought of “privacy,” there is not a way to prevent ISPs from viewing or using this information. Scott Schaffer from Blade Technology joins us for more on the recent Congressional decision to kill Internet privacy protections.”

3. Brexit Live: Triggering Article 50 (House Of Commons) – BBC News (2017-03-29)


BBC News – “We’re live in the House of Commons where PM Theresa May due to trigger Article 50 thus formally beginning UK’s departure from the European Union. Giving official notice under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, it will be delivered to European Council president Donald Tusk later. In a statement in the Commons, the prime minister will then tell MPs this marks “the moment for the country to come together”. It follows June’s referendum which resulted in a vote to leave the EU.”

3. Will Britain benefit from leaving the EU? (2017-03-29)


Fox Business – “British journalist Robin Leach on the U.K. leaving the European Union.”