GOP’s Justin Amash Supports Trump Impeachment

Justin Amash, a Republican representative from Michigan, has become the first GOP member of Congress to publicly say that Donald Trump should be impeached. Amash, though a libertarian, is a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus, whose members tend to be significantly more right-leaning than other Republicans. Until Justin Amash’s recent statements, the support for impeachment has been split along party lines.

On Saturday, May 18, Amash tweeted that he had come to four conclusions after reading the redacted Mueller report.

“Here are my principal conclusions:”

“1. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report.
2. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct.
3. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances.
4. Few members of Congress have read the report.”

“I offer these conclusions,” said Amash, “only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely, having read or watched pertinent statements and testimony, and having discussed this matter with my staff, who thoroughly reviewed materials and provided me with further analysis.”

Justin Amash, known for standing on principal, has frequently been at odds with Trump, as well as with fellow Republicans. This is significant because Amash is ultra-conservative. With his recent statements supporting Trump’s impeachment, he is taking a position that has been associated with the Democrats. This partisan thinking, Amash points out, is preventing meaningful and productive activity —namely justice — from occurring.

“Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law — the foundation of liberty — crumbles.”

Not all Democrats currently support impeachment of Trump. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has advised a prudent approach, pointing out that rushing to impeachment could backfire and cost the Democrats the 2020 presidential election.

But Justin Amash reminds us all that our government is not in place to interpret the law or the Constitution for partisan political gain:

“America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it,” said Amash.

GOP congressman among first to say Trump impeachment possible | CBS News [2019-05-17]

GOP Rep. Justin Amash Calls For Trump’s Impeachment With No Specific Reason | Own the Libs with Facts [2019-05-18]

White House Staff Who Resisted Trump’s Orders

A number of Trump staff members and subordinates have resisted following Trump’s orders on various occasions, according to Robert Mueller’s report on the Russia investigation into possible ties between Russia and the 2016 presidential election. Though staff have ignored Trump’s orders at various times not related to the Russia investigation, the instances documented in the Mueller report are significant because had staff members not resisted Trump’s orders, they, or Trump, would have been guilty of attempting to impede the investigation.

In his report, Mueller wrote, “The President’s efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests.”

One of the most memorable was former FBI Director James Comey, whom Trump fired in 2017, for various reported reasons, including not complying with Trump’s request to publicly confirm that Trump was not personally under investigation in connection with the Russia probe. Trump’s firing of Comey was the catalyst for Robert Mueller’s investigation.

Here are other examples of White House staff who resisted Trump’s orders:

Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who recused himself from the Russia investigation, resigned under pressure in November of 2017. Sessions, who supported Trump’s harsh policies on many issues, including immigration, nevertheless suffered ongoing derision at the hands of Trump, particularly for recusing himself, and for declining Trump’s request to walk back his recusal.

Former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus resisted Trump’s orders when Trump pressured him to force Jeff Sessions to resign, though Priebus did at first tell Trump he would speak to Sessions. According to Mueller’s report, however, later that day, “Priebus replied that if they fired Sessions, they would never get a new Attorney General confirmed and that the Department of Justice and Congress would turn their backs on the President.” Trump later agreed not to force Sessions to resign at that point.

Former Deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland declined to follow Trump’s request that she write an internal email confirming that Trump “did not direct Flynn to call the Russian Ambassador about sanctions. Priebus said he told the President he would only direct McFarland to write such a letter if she were comfortable with it,” according to Mueller’s report.

The report acknowledges that Trump was not necessarily asking McFarland to lie, but McFarland didn’t know “the full extent of Flynn’s communications with the President and thus could not make the representation the President wanted.” McFarland was sufficiently uncomfortable with Trump’s request and was compelled to document the request.

Some of the other White House staff who refused to comply with Trump’s orders include Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, and White House Counsel Don McGahn.

William Barr, the current Attorney General, has said that no charges were to be brought against Donald Trump for obstruction of justice as a result of Robert Mueller’s report. However, it’s likely that the only reason Trump won’t be charged with obstruction is that these and other staff members resisted Trump’s orders.

Trump tried to stop Mueller investigation, but staff wouldn’t let him, says report | PBS NewsHour [2019-04-18]

Is the Mueller report a roadmap for impeachment? | Fox News [2019-04-22]